A well-prepared technical rider and stage plot can be the difference between a seamless live performance and a show plagued by last‑minute chaos. Start by outlining core information: your band or artists, contact details, requested backline, monitor levels, stage dimensions, and any safety considerations. Then translate those needs into measurable, concrete specs rather than vague desires. Judges appreciate entries that anticipate common pitfalls and offer actionable solutions. Include a concise glossary for terminology, a realistic stage diagram, and a briefing note for the crew. The aim is to minimize back-and-forth and maximize reliability, without sacrificing artistic intent.
The technical rider must be tailored to the contest’s rules while reflecting the true nature of your sound. Do not overstate capabilities; be honest about what you can deliver and what requires support. Break down each instrument and vocal setup, noting amplification, DI usage, effects, and routing. Clarify preferred brands and models only if non‑negotiable, otherwise specify essential characteristics like impedance, headroom, and stereo imaging. Attach diagrams showing cable pathways, mic placements, and stage flow. A strong rider also includes environmental notes—room acoustics, typical audience size, and potential external constraints—so crew can plan contingencies without breaking the performance concept.
Practical, contest-compliant rider and plot that anticipate contingencies.
A detailed stage plot complements the rider by offering a visual map that translates written requests into practical execution. Sketch the stage from several viewpoints: front-on, audience perspective, and backstage. Indicate equipment locations with precise coordinates or measured distances, show power drops and circuit assignments, and mark any temporary infrastructure. Include a cue system diagram if you rely on lighting or video triggers, and annotate responsibilities so technicians know when to execute transitions. The plot should reduce ambiguity, enabling a novice crew member to stage-manage confidently. Remember to align timing with your setlist and soundcheck plan for maximum cohesion.
When drafting the stage plot, prioritize readability. Use a clean legend for symbols representing microphones, monitors, stands, and pedals. Keep fonts large enough to be legible at a distance, and provide a scalable file version in addition to printouts. Add a brief narrative section that describes the signal flow from input to output, highlighting any stereo or multi‑channel routing. If your performance employs unusual spatial effects or audience interaction cues, incorporate them with arrows and note dependencies on lighting or projection. A well-structured diagram reduces the chance of miscommunication during load-in, rehearsal, and showtime.
Components that demonstrate planning, clarity, and reliability.
Your rider should also cover practicalities beyond gear, such as access times, load-in routes, and dressing room arrangements. Specify how long you expect to need the stage, where equipment can be placed, and where crew can stage gear safely. Include provisions for power, water, and a dedicated workspace for techs. Address accessibility considerations for any band members with mobility needs, ensuring compliance with venue policies. A brief section on risk management—cables taped, mats placed, and fire exits kept clear—demonstrates professionalism. Finally, offer a concise escalation path for technical issues so the contest organizers can connect with the right contact quickly.
For the audio chain, document the exact signal path and preferred processing. List input sources, mic types and placements, DI boxes, insert points, and patch bays. Outline the expected monitor mix for each performer, including any sidefill or in-ear monitoring needs. If you use parallel effects or subgroups, specify routing to the front‑of‑house and the monitor console. Include headroom expectations and reference levels to avoid distortion. Attach any relevant studio or live‑sound references to guide engineers toward your intended tone. The more precise your routing and gain structure, the faster you’ll reach a balanced, audience-ready sound.
Safety, accessibility, and professional coordination throughout the process.
A compelling rider communicates you understand the realities of live sound and venue constraints. Explain your tolerance for variables such as stage size, ceiling height, and room reflections. If your setup relies on particular measurements, provide tolerances and acceptable substitutes. Include alternative configurations for smaller stages or limited backline. Mention support requirements like backstage electrical outlet counts, lighting levels, or backstage temperature preferences. By acknowledging boundaries and offering practical compromises, you position yourself as a cooperative professional rather than a demanding act. This approach reduces the risk of a mismatch that could derail performance quality.
In addition to gear specifics, incorporate a communication framework. Designate a primary point of contact for the contest team, a backup contact, and a clear channel for last‑minute changes. Provide a pre‑load-in plan with a tentative schedule that respects venue constraints and travel times. Include a pre‑show conference script so staff understand key cues, call times, and safety notes. Emphasize collaboration over rigidity, inviting questions and offering prompt, courteous responses. A rider that prioritizes smooth collaboration signals to judges that you are dependable and considerate—qualities that elevate your professional image.
Final polish: presentation, consistency, and longevity of the submission.
A robust rider pays attention to safety and accessibility in equal measure. Detail cable management strategies, secure all stands, and specify floor protection where needed. If pyrotechnics, strobe lighting, or high‑volume playback are part of your act, note the exact controls and required safety clearances. Provide accessibility accommodations such as step-free routes and preferred seating for crew with disabilities, ensuring compliance with local regulations. Include emergency contact information and a brief incident reporting procedure. By proactively addressing safety, you reassure organizers and demonstrate a mature, responsible approach to live performance.
Stage plot clarity extends to timing and cueing. Attach a simple run sheet that aligns with your set list, including start times, cues for lighting changes, and fade durations. If you rely on visual or live video cues, specify timing windows and trigger devices. Explain how you will communicate with stage management during the show—hand signals, eye contact, or callouts. A well‑oriented run sheet helps the venue staff execute your performance precisely as envisioned, while reducing the chance of off‑cue moments or misaligned lighting.
The presentation of your rider and stage plot matters almost as much as the content themselves. Use a professional layout with a clear table of contents, section headers, and consistent formatting throughout. Save files in widely accessible formats like PDF and a scalable diagram package so the contest committee can review without special software. Keep the document free of extraneous jargon and ensure every claim has concrete support in your diagrams or notes. A clean, professional package signals attention to detail and respect for the selection process, reinforcing your credibility from the first glance.
Finally, review and revision are essential steps before submission. Have a trusted sound engineer or bandmate audit the rider for completeness and realism. Run through the entire scenario in a rehearsal room to verify that every line item translates into a feasible action. Update contact information, equipment lists, and power requirements based on progress and any changes in personnel. Include a brief note about anticipated contingencies and how you would handle them. By treating the rider as a living document, you ensure it remains accurate, actionable, and persuasive to contest judges.
